1984 Lada 2105 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1984 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1984 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lada 2105 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Lada | Mazda |
| Model | 2105 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2880 mm |
