1984 Lada 2105 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1984 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Lada 2105.
Because 1984 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lada 2105 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 2105 | 3 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2639 mm |