1984 Lada 2105 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1984 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 778 kg more than 1984 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lada 2105 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Lada | Cadillac |
| Model | 2105 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2880 mm |
