1984 Lada 2105 vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1984 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1984 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Lada 2105 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lada 2105 | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Lada | Suzuki |
Model | 2105 | Equator |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3200 mm |