1984 Lancia Beta vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lancia Beta (101 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 374 kg more than 1984 Lancia Beta.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lancia Beta | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Beta | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1984 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1036 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3030 mm |