1984 Lancia Delta vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1984 Lancia Delta. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1984 Lancia Delta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lancia Delta. (105 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lancia Delta. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1984 Lancia Delta has manual transmission. 1984 Lancia Delta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lancia Delta | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Delta | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1302 cc | 2298 cc |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
