1984 Lancia Trevi vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lancia Trevi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lancia Trevi would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1984 Lancia Trevi. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1984 Lancia Trevi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 184 kg more than 1984 Lancia Trevi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lancia Trevi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lancia Trevi. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lancia Trevi. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1984 Lancia Trevi has manual transmission. 1984 Lancia Trevi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Lancia Trevi 2009 Mazda CX-9
Make Lancia Mazda
Model Trevi CX-9
Year Released 1984 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1583 cc 3725 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 100 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 134 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1145 kg 1329 kg
Vehicle Length 4330 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 L 76 L