1984 Lancia Trevi vs. 2013 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lancia Trevi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lancia Trevi would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1984 Lancia Trevi. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1984 Lancia Trevi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 505 kg more than 1984 Lancia Trevi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Lancia Trevi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lancia Trevi. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lancia Trevi.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Lancia Trevi 2013 Ford Mustang
Make Lancia Ford
Model Trevi Mustang
Year Released 1984 2013
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1583 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 100 HP 301 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 134 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 71.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1145 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 4330 mm 4778 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 2035 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1425 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]