1984 Lincoln Continental vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1984 Lincoln Continental is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1984 Lincoln Continental. (138 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Lincoln Continental.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lincoln Continental | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | Continental | Ranger |
Year Released | 1984 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4690 mm |