1984 Lincoln Continental vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (220 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1984 Lincoln Continental. (138 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1984 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 210 kg more than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lincoln Continental (339 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (312 Nm). This means 1984 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lincoln Continental | 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Lincoln | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Continental | CLK |
Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 312 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |