1984 Lincoln Continental vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1984 Lincoln Continental. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1984 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lincoln Continental (339 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1984 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lincoln Continental | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Continental | Colorado |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |