1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1956 Singer Gazelle
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Singer Gazelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Singer Gazelle would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1956 Singer Gazelle. (48 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1956 Singer Gazelle.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lotus Etna | 1956 Singer Gazelle | |
| Make | Lotus | Singer |
| Model | Etna | Gazelle |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 73.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 89.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2440 mm |
