1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Saab 95. (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Saab 95.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 1959 Saab 95 | |
Make | Lotus | Saab |
Model | Etna | 95 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 82 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2500 mm |