1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. (104 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lotus Etna | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Lotus | Triumph |
| Model | Etna | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2140 mm |
