1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1963 Rover P6
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1963 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P6. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P6.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 1963 Rover P6 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | Etna | P6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |