1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1967 Volvo 120
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1967 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1967 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lotus Etna | 1967 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Lotus | Volvo |
| Model | Etna | 120 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 84.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
