1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1973 Triumph GT6
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph GT6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph GT6 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1973 Triumph GT6. (104 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph GT6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph GT6. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph GT6.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 1973 Triumph GT6 | |
Make | Lotus | Triumph |
Model | Etna | GT6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2120 mm |