1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lotus Etna | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Etna | 616 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |
