1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (102 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (167 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Etna | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1984 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |