1984 Lotus Etna vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
Model | Etna | Lancer |
Year Released | 1984 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2390 mm |