1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2003 Volvo C70

To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2003 Volvo C70. (160 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo C70.

Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo C70. (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo C70. 2003 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1984 Lotus Etna has manual transmission. 1984 Lotus Etna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Lotus Etna 2003 Volvo C70
Make Lotus Volvo
Model Etna C70
Year Released 1984 2003
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3946 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 331 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 408 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 95.2 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 69.3 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.2:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1150 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2670 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]