1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2004 MG ZT is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT. (158 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Lotus | MG |
Model | Etna | ZT |
Year Released | 1984 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2760 mm |