1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK (361 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1984 Lotus Etna. (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK (500 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lotus Etna. (408 Nm). This means 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Etna | SLK |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 361 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 500 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 97.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2440 mm |