1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lotus Etna | 2005 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Lotus | Renault |
| Model | Etna | Megane |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2740 mm |
