1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2006 Opel Zafira
To start off, 2006 Opel Zafira is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Zafira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lotus Etna | 2006 Opel Zafira | |
| Make | Lotus | Opel |
| Model | Etna | Zafira |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2500 mm |
