1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (252 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac BLS.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac BLS. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1984 Lotus Etna has manual transmission. 1984 Lotus Etna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Lotus | Cadillac |
Model | Etna | BLS |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 365 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.3 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2680 mm |