1984 Maserati Bi Turbo vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo (182 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 383 kg more than 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Maserati Bi Turbo | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Maserati | Honda |
| Model | Bi Turbo | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2630 mm |
