1984 Mazda 323 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1984 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 938 kg more than 1984 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mazda 323 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 323 | CTS |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1071 cc | 3175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2890 mm |