1984 Mazda 929 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000

To start off, 1984 Mazda 929 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1984 Mazda 929.

Let's talk about torque, 1984 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Mazda 929 1967 Triumph 2000
Make Mazda Triumph
Model 929 2000
Year Released 1984 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1152 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2700 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]