1984 Mazda 929 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1984 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 63 kg more than 1984 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1984 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mazda 929 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 929 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |
