1984 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (420 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 1984 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1034 kg more than 1984 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee (569 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mazda 929 | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mazda | Jeep |
| Model | 929 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 6100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 2186 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4956 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1694 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2781 mm |
