1984 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1942 Simca 5
To start off, 1984 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 530 kg more than 1942 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mazda Cosmo | 1942 Simca 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Simca |
Model | Cosmo | 5 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1942 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2010 mm |