1984 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1988 Pininfarina Hit
To start off, 1988 Pininfarina Hit is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda Cosmo would be higher.
Because 1984 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Pininfarina Hit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mazda Cosmo | 1988 Pininfarina Hit | |
Make | Mazda | Pininfarina |
Model | Cosmo | Hit |
Year Released | 1984 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |