1984 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,616 cc (2 cylinders), 1984 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 595 kg more than 1984 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mazda Cosmo | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | Challenger |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2730 mm |