1984 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 80 kg more than 1984 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1984 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1984 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mazda Cosmo | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Cosmo | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
