1984 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Fiat Freemont

To start off, 2012 Fiat Freemont is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Freemont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Freemont (168 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1984 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Freemont should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Freemont weights approximately 610 kg more than 1984 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Freemont, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Fiat Freemont has automatic transmission and 1984 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1984 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Fiat Freemont will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: