1984 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 80 kg more than 1984 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |