1984 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1952 Rover P4
To start off, 1984 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1984 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mazda RX-7 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rover P4 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1984 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Rover P4 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Rover P4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mazda RX-7 | 1952 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-7 | P4 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2101 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 52 L |