1984 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 243 more horse power than 1984 Mazda RX-7. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1984 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda RX-7. (158 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mazda RX-7 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-7 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
