1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1995 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 380 kg more than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1984 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mercury Cougar | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Cougar | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1984 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2440 mm |