1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 2000 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2000 Ford Windstar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mercury Cougar | 2000 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Cougar | Windstar |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1946 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3066 mm |