1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 2002 Audi A6
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1984 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mercury Cougar | 2002 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Mercury | Audi |
| Model | Cougar | A6 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2850 mm |
