1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 2002 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2002 Skoda Superb is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Skoda Superb weights approximately 20 kg more than 1984 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1984 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mercury Cougar | 2002 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Mercury | Skoda |
Model | Cougar | Superb |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2771 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2810 mm |