1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 2002 Volvo V70
To start off, 2002 Volvo V70 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 81 kg more than 2002 Volvo V70.
Because 2002 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mercury Cougar | 2002 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Cougar | V70 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 295 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2800 mm |