1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 2007 MG ZT
To start off, 2007 MG ZT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 MG ZT weights approximately 80 kg more than 1984 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1984 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mercury Cougar | 2007 MG ZT | |
Make | Mercury | MG |
Model | Cougar | ZT |
Year Released | 1984 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |