1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2010 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Ridgeline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Ridgeline weights approximately 563 kg more than 1984 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2010 Honda Ridgeline is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Honda Ridgeline | |
Make | Mercury | Honda |
Model | Cougar | Ridgeline |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3110 mm |