1984 Mercury Cougar vs. 2012 Volvo S80
To start off, 2012 Volvo S80 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S80 weights approximately 279 kg more than 1984 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2012 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mercury Cougar | 2012 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Cougar | S80 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1759 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1864 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2776 mm |