1984 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1981 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ronda. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Seat Ronda weights approximately 30 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt (102 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ronda. (98 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1984 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mitsubishi Colt | 1981 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Colt | Ronda |
Year Released | 1984 | 1981 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1437 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2460 mm |