1984 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2000 Porsche Boxster
To start off, 2000 Porsche Boxster is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Porsche Boxster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Porsche Boxster (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2000 Porsche Boxster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Porsche Boxster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Porsche Boxster (335 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Porsche Boxster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | 2000 Porsche Boxster | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Porsche |
| Model | Colt | Boxster |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1437 cc | 3179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2420 mm |
