1984 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,437 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 175 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mitsubishi Colt | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Mitsubishi | ZAZ |
Model | Colt | Wagon |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1437 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2330 mm |